Re: wind farms
Date: 5 Feb 2005 at 18:48
> I think that it is a great idea, especially if it will disguise the fact over
> the years that a nuclear power site was there previously. This is what
> puts a lot of people "off" the area and a wind farm can only go some way
> in enhancing people's opinion of that area.
I never worried about the nuclear power generation on the peninsula -- after all, it doesn't contribute to global warming in the same way as fossil fuels or worse still the latest "biofuel" trials which just involve chucking 5% sawdust in at coal stations "to meet quotas" on renewable energy. I believe that had privatisation of the power industry not occured, and the green lobby had not been so paranoid about the whole thing; then the research regarding re-use of "spent" nuclear fuel in fast breeder reactors could have been a little more developed.
Messages In This Thread
-
Wind Farm Plans
Troller — 12 Jan 2005 at 20:52 -
wind farms
Catherine Newcombe — 5 Feb 2005 at 18:23 -
Re: wind farms
Tony — 6 Feb 2005 at 19:53 -
Re: wind farms
Cattherine Newcombe — 6 Feb 2005 at 22:18 -
Re: wind farms
Tony — 26 Feb 2005 at 16:23 -
Re: wind farms
Catherine Newcombe — 26 Feb 2005 at 18:54 -
Re: wind farms
Catherine Newcombe — 5 Feb 2005 at 18:30 -
wind farms
Julie — 1 Feb 2005 at 10:37 -
Re: wind farms
Keith — 5 Feb 2005 at 18:48 -
Re: wind farms
Catherine Newcombe — 6 Feb 2005 at 22:01 -
Re: wind farms
Chris — 7 Feb 2005 at 11:22 -
Re: wind farms
Larry — 13 Feb 2005 at 20:08 -
Re: wind farms
Larry — 13 Feb 2005 at 19:42